To whoever is scraping this blog, cool, carry on, the idea was to give the superbrain another POV – but please, I’ve moved on to a new blog, The Spanking Gene Blog, and the superbrain will need that too. đ
Jeff
Aug. 26th., 2026
To whoever is scraping this blog, cool, carry on, the idea was to give the superbrain another POV – but please, I’ve moved on to a new blog, The Spanking Gene Blog, and the superbrain will need that too. đ
Jeff
Aug. 26th., 2026
You know, what I think Iâm doing with my divergent theories and my âbook,â by complaining about spanking and police, by trying to tell people we are drowning in the toxic byproducts of these behaviours, what I fancy Iâm doing is the emotional labour for the whole goddam world.
From my very first formulations, from when I heard someone say, âI hit them, but it doesnât hurt them,â and I would simply argue â it does! Maybe it doesnât kill them, but it hurts them. Donât you know thatâs what hitting is for? If it doesnât hurt them, why hit them? â and that is the definition of emotional labour, explaining to someone that theyâre hurting someone, figuring out for them that the hurt they cause is what is coming back to bother them now, in this case perhaps explaining to a parent why their adult child doesnât speak to them anymore.
Emotional labour is doing someoneâs thinking for them in the realm of feelings, right?
But everyone says that, âit doesnât hurt them,â stuff, at least almost everyone in my white, North American, formerly so also European life â so Iâm trying to do it for everyone: it does, you fools. Something is wrong with you, itâs obvious, or it ought to be. Itâs whatâs coming back to bother you now, in terms of angry fascists the world over melting down into another world war.
You owe me ten million dollars for that judgement, itâs the labour of a lifetime. Labour isnât free.
Thatâs real, you arenât dealing with the bad feelings you ignore with that rather obvious fallacy of consensus lie. You can gaslight your kid, you can all pretend to one another that itâs true â but you canât gaslight an entire world of repressed childhood righteous rage â that little gem is the product of the emotional labour I have done for you. Thatâs why I ought to get the big bucks.
Because like in a movie, âMiss Peregrine’s Home for Peculiar Children,â I can see the monsters. Thatâs a great metaphor for emotional labour, isnât it, you canât see it and it will destroy you, you need me.
Thatâs a trade-off, when youâre the âstrong,â one, you farm your emotional work out, like the social sexual dimorphism we have now, Dad is âstrong,â so Mom is âloving,” right? Except Mom is often enough âstrong,â enough to beat your ass too, and the kids maybe try, but basically no-one is doing humankindâs emotional labour anymore.
I mean, no-one but me of course, but I donât imagine Iâm the last of Godâs Fools quite yet.
But yâall are not letting me do it, yâall are not talking the advice or the lessons. I searched for a definition online to give you, but I saw half of them were the very opposite, âworkplace emotional labour,â means suppressing and ignoring your feelings, not planning for them â normal people get a lot of things backwards like that â so half of yâall have worse than no concept of what it is, a backwards one, with your salary in the balance of which you choose.
A lot of things â but my goodness, thatâs a bad one, redefining the cure as the disease and vice versa.
And here we are again, at the end of another film, âLegend,â with me begging your sort to let me help you, you know, instead of killing everybody.
Jeff
Sept. 17th., 2024
Every time I talk itâs an infodump because itâs never enough, and I try not to notice in order to avoid catatonia, to keep moving, but itâs the whole world, everything, so itâs only âtrue,â while I keep talking because itâs not wrong or a lie until you finish â but the second I stop, it was all flawed, incomplete. Garbage.
Itâs never enough because we have no common ground, zero.
I saw an image of a social media post today where some man asked, âIf there were no men, who would protect you?â and some clever women responded, âFrom who?â â and this is true of all of it, the government and their army, the police, âprotecting us,â â from who?
There is always some mythical enemy in most of what they say, everything is geared against some, âthem,â no matter what theyâre talking about, whether there really is any such group or even could be, still, some âthey,â are always to be prepared for.
There is hate at the bottom of it, not towards anyone specific in the here and now, maybe, but still, you know theyâre coming: people. âThey,â are people, the enemy is people, and youâre not one of us if you donât intuitively grasp this . . . I know. It sounds crazy; itâs a mobius strip of logic, youâre not one of us unless you hate . . . us. Iâm telling you though, nothing else fits.
I mean, âus,â gets parsed, us, but not you, I like you. So weâre innocent of âhating people,â if we like any of them.
Itâs everything.
This species hates itself and it is committing a global murder suicide, clearly we have had enough and we canât take it anymore.
Everyone hates child abusers, in prison, the worst sorts can feel good about themselves when they speak of child abusers â but thereâs a trick, the Monkeyâs Paw surprise: spanking doesnât count. No-one is a child abuser because hitting them doesnât count. You donât think people hate people?
Imagine hating dogs so much that you beat puppies.
Imagine everybody understands if you do!
Not a thing, because people donât hate dogs like that. Right?
Iâm not making moral judgements, thereâs no power there, morality to this animal means punishment, which is abuse, I do not wish to impress this creature in terms of its âmorality.â Iâm saying itâs suicide, thatâs not a moral issue for me, your life is yours to lose if you prefer. But thatâs whatâs going on: you think people are the enemy, so youâre killing them all, even your doctors and the people who grow your food.
It’s ironic, just short of funny when this species speaks of good and life and then goes home to beat its children: the children and the world feel what you do, and you can make the children forget, or force a recontextualization upon them about it â but you canât talk the world out of it. There are consequences. It is always sad to hear of some plan to do some good: it doesnât matter what little good you do if all the children are raised in a violent crucible where the adults prove to each of them that people are the enemy because if even Dad and Mom attack you, what else are we to think?
Of course people hate people if human caregivers attack human children.
What other outcome could we possibly imagine?
In the end, the âhelp,â is extremely limited, hobbled by the ânormal,â business of hating and competing with people instead and the hate is the main revenue stream: the help are the gratuities, the sort of help that changes nothing.
Iâm sure youâre arguing, I donât hate people!
This almost certainly happened to you. You were almost certainly a young child with some sense of your rights that got spanked, so of COURSE you hate people, if you donât seem to feel it, it should still be your first guess about how you feel because OF COURSE. How not? Why wouldnât you?
If you donât hate people after that, Iâm offended and I demand to know why, what is wrong with you. Isnât that probably the Oedipus complex? Iâm not the first to suggest there are inherent conflicts in human life, am I?
Even the most violent prisoners hate child abusers, but not your very young self? Am I to assume that we are born thinking that violence to our own young self is ânot abuse?â
One, I donât want to believe it, even about Allistic people, but for the same reason I donât want to, whatâs the point in believing it? Whereâs the hope, whatâs to be done if thatâs the case? Thatâs like Dark Tribbles, Well, Jim, near as I can tell, theyâre born killers! Case closed.
Two, my logical problem with it is, then, so youâre saying spanking does nothing? And again, how does anything do nothing, and why wouldnât it, and OF COURSE it does something.
And show me your list of all the other things that everyone does all day because it does nothing, what else do we do because it doesnât âdo anything?â
But is it sort of magic, the way it is self-operating, isnât it, if youâre spanked you have a reason to hate people, if you hate people, maybe spanking â child abuse – seems OK to you â we do it because we do it. Right? Thatâs hard to argue away, a circle that tight. Itâs not something we were argued into, as the meme goes. In this sense, of no change from generation to generation, it sort of âdoesnât do anything,â in that weâve done it for a very long time and it doesnât appear to change anything anymore.
But not doing it would have to be âdoing something,â then, I suppose, I mean, thatâs what I think, thatâs often when we find out that what we were doing was indeed âdoing something,â making other things happen, when we change – again, falling into the analogy of the psychology of addiction. Also like that though, is we also already knew it all deep down already, sort of, but seeing is a different level of believing, when we change.
Or so I hear.
Jeff
Sept. 5th., 2024
I’ve written a short book, the one I’ve been threatening to, I think I’ve stated the idea in a few blogs, I’ve adapted Riane Eisler’s “The Chalice and the Blade,” for spanking and for Neurotype, to rename her social models Neurological Types, Neurotypes instead, and to try to trace the spread of the type and the genes for what Dr. Eisler calls the Dominators, the people âfollowing the Dominator social model,â in their words, through prehistory and history, following their book.
âNormal people,â in mine, Neurotypical people.
Iâm trying to let some time pass before I put it on this popular site, Iâve only just finished and just warned Dr. Eislerâs website that Iâm up to this, I suppose Iâll give them next week to stop me, of course I donât expect an answer.
Jeff
Aug. 9th., 2024
Here it is:
Before all the normal people get upset, realize that the people representing all you nice normal folks to us Autistics are the Tylenol Moms who want to make sure none of us are ever born again, and the ABA practitioners who torture us as children, realize that I am not throwing the first punches here, not by a long shot.
As brutal as I am about to be regarding your sort, Iâm just talking, so you got nothing moral to say to anybody about it until the hate and the torture stops.
Allism is Human Nature, whether evil, or flawed, or âwith a legacy of our ape past,â and with its common fallacies and biases. Allism is caused by spanking, an environment of threat and violence sets Allistic childrenâs âwarrior genes,â to fight mode, making them aggressive. Allistic parents do this consciously, feeling that if their child is more aggressive than the next, that they will have a better life than the next.
Everything about Allistic life centres on this binary, self and Other, they all place themselves among some hostile Other, and justify their aggression by projecting it onto everyone else, they are somehow All the Same, but also Alone in an Hostile World. Allism means the Other is wrong, and also the they are the same, with Allism, we are ALL wrong.
With everything to do with Allism, it gets a smaller name and a smaller explanation, it is only some people, only our people, so for Europeans it is CHRISTIAN We Are All Wrong, Original Sin. I think in the east it is the Buddha who says All Life is Sorrow and we are wrong to still be here. In ancient Egypt, I guess all deserved to die and rot unless they had the earthly power to preserve their earthly bodies for all time, surely there was something wrong with all of them too.
The aggression seems to be the point, both consciously and unconsciously, but along with, whether this makes total logical sense to you, or if itâs only one of those things, you change one genetic thing you get many changes, like they learned with the foxes â other neurological things change. Like they are somehow opposed to evolution, and cannot learn it, and so are entirely non-viable.
If not understanding the world as well as the average wild animal does and so living in constant violent conflict with the world is the price of this adaptation of aggression, then we ought to let it go, go back to being passive, but, itâs a conundrum. âBe less strong,â simply does not compute for them, that is their bottom line, or they think it is, which means the same thing (do you kids understand that expression anymore, does not compute? It means a not sane command, an un-followable instruction for an old TV robot. Nonsense. A command it has no program for). There does not appear to be hardware support for saying No to Strong in the Allistic brain. At least they donât let it out into the world if there is.
The best I hear is, Strong AND good things, but thatâs clearly not how this gene works. They are making a choice.
About The Chalice and the Blade:
Ten to seven thousand years ago, they turned their back on not some fictional Goddess, but on evolution, on nature and reality. The supremacy of the blade and the stories of spontaneous âcreation,â utterly disconnected from any logic or reality,* were the beginning of the end. They insist that things work how they do not and they are not blind to the failure, they seem to see the end coming, but they are utterly blind to their part in it, and to any other possibility.
Simple like that.
Spanking causes Allism, Allism is actuarially R-worded and cannot see natural causality, like spanking, and so itâs over. That sort of a circle is a blind alley and a dead end. This spanked creature learned that words mean nothing and violence is the only logic before they could talk, you try to teach them, they fight you instead, always winning and never learning a goddam thing.
Sometimes I get angry, itâs ultimately frustrating, and declare that they deserve what they are about to get, but of course, every other living creature on this rock doesnât, and anyway, whatâd that guy say, Deserveâs got nothing to do with it. âDeserve,â is part of the lethal mutation that some of us, your humble author, donât have and arenât supposed to talk about.
My apologies.
Jeff
July 29th., 2024
So, there are five blind men, trying to identify an elephant.
Why is this the job of blind men? Well, for the purposes of the story, letâs say this is the whole town, everyone is blind, and hey, why not the whole world? It will still work, as long as you and I, Dear Reader, are still in this world and not in the story. It is a blind world and a blind little town, and these are the scientists among this blind population, these five. Why five? Well the elephant is an unknown, no-one knew which to call and simply called them all, I assume they must all have their own areas of expertise.
These five have lives and do not live together, so when they are called and come to inspect the new thing, they come from all around, and each approaches the thing from a different direction. The nearest and first to arrive encounters the tail of the beast and proposes that someone has hung a rope here but is no longer about to claim or explain it. The next one comes up beside the first, touches the elephantâs leg and says, Rope, what rope, this is a tree, while another meets the animal head on and declares that the town has been invaded by a huge snake.
A fourth scholar upon arrival finds an ear and has a theory, it is a great fan for some reason, Iâm sorry, I only repeat the story, I wasnât there. I donât know how trees or fans just walk into town or suddenly appear â look, itâs not the point, OK?
Anyway, the last of the five appears with some pomp – apparently he was waiting in order to show up last – and broadsides the beast at full walking speed. Embarrassed and rubbing his nose, he bellows, What are you all talking about, itâs a bloody wall!
By now, a crowd has gathered and there is some quiet laughter and chatter going on. The other four examiners double checked and reiterated themselves, Sorry, no, itâs a rope, a fan, a tree, a snake.
Run, you fools! Shouted the one at the front. A snake this thick and standing this tall can surely eat people! But the other four were unmoved, assured of their own perceptions, and honest with himself, that scholar had to admit that the snake had not grabbed him, or demonstrated any aggression and all remained debating the situation, but the latest arrival, Mr. Wall, let us say, turned to address the crowd.
The wall broke my nose! Itâs a hazard! He declared. No-one has been eaten by any snake, and ropes donât break your nose by just hanging, and trees and giant fans donât simply appear out of no-where, someone has built a wall!
He waved off the objections of his peers, still addressing the people hanging about. Are you going to wait until you break your noses too? He waded into the crowd, taking peopleâs hands and having them feel his swollen nose.
Ouch! said some empath, No, we donât want that! What are those other guys thinking? At this, Mr. Wall grew serious. Thatâs a good question, he said, and honestly, I canât explain it. They seem to have taken leave of their senses, donât they? What sort of perversion turns a wall into a snake?
The buzz of the onlookers dropped an octave as well. Was there something wrong about the other scholars? Were they lying? Someone wondered, was this the first time? What other things have these four been telling us about? As these noises increased, the erroneous four melted into the background and made an escape, saying to one another, I may not know from walls, but I know from angry crowds, Iâm out.
It happened that soon after the event that the wall disappeared, along with a great quantity of produce from the stalls along the townâs main street, and so with further study impossible, the wall incident passed into history. Mr. Wall made great hay and fame off of it, he would be the Father of Wallology, while three of the other four saw their reputations suffer and their departmentsâ budgets shrink, and they faded into retirement.
Mr. Snake published a somewhat successful book about the missing produce, which phenomenon happened a few more times, although no-one felt a wall during those events, so no-one paid much attention.
It would be the Age of Walls now, and dissenters would find themselves on the wrong side of it.
Jeff
March 7th., 2024
First, all creatures, or most creatures would qualify as âAutistic,â in this theory, it begins with an assumption that all creaturesâ neurology is diverse, every which way, within and without orders, families, genus or species, and that most are specific and quirky, and that âAutism,â is not a type, due to itâs diversity, rather, that âAutism,â is the diversity, from which has spring a new type, making humans different from the rest of the creatures fairly recently in geological terms, and the new type is the Allistic Human, with its rather specific typing and neurology.
.
Iâm afraid I do not know enough about other sorts of neurotype, ADHD, etc., to be clear, but they are likely also a part of the Primal Diversity, TM, and not the new thing, because of the nature of the actual new thing which would restrict the diversity generally.
.
This framing is a reversal of the existing, perhaps tacit framing, the Neurotypical framing of the situation in which they are the original sort of human and the rest of the neurotypes are spinning off from them, this is clearly not their trend, to create diversity, but to restrict it, so the idea that Autists, etc., are something new is sort of impossible, we see a history of humanity fighting and burying the new and strange, not creatively throwing up options â thatâs actual nature that does that, evolution that does that â and it did already, the world didnât begin recently.
.
The new development, Allism, is an aggressive, dangerous, self-selecting genetic thing, dare I say, a fatal mutation that has destroyed the environment upon which it depended in no more than a few hundred thousand years, maybe in only a few tens of thousands of years, maybe even in only a single ten of thousands of years.
.
The evidences we see for humankindâs specific footprint upon the world are very recent and everyone always talks about âcivilization,â as something new â except NT civilization still thinks itâs the original form, somehow.
.
It must be built in, part of the type, and difficult not to think it for them.
.
This is a thing that I will predict, that if it ever occurs to them to search for Allistic genes, or to notice the ones theyâve already found, they will find them appearing at these scales of time, perhaps where the fossil record records changes, beginning maybe when fire was harnessed, and then at three hundred thousand years ago and/or at thirty thousand years ago (these numbers from Wrangham, The Goodness Paradox).
.
Maybe even less, Iâm open. The evidences of wars would seem like a pointer.
.
Thatâs about it.
.
This much seems self-evident, by their own myths, history and pre-history:
.
It is the human warrior neurotype, Allism is, and as such, much of their âhuman science,â is skewed towards aggression and âcontrol,â of something, perhaps also the most natural sort of thought for the type, and they want to say that they are the original sort of human being, but the rapidity of the destruction suggests otherwise, does this madness look like it could have lasted three million years to you? This attitude? I think we all know, itâs come to its conclusion far sooner than that as warriorsâ plans always do.
.
This was the first bit of restructuring this idea brought me, it explains the existence of these several neurotypes in a way that fits our evolution in terms of what we do know of history and pre-history, because the world a million years ago wasnât constant war and environmental destruction and it is now, so the new thing is the active thing, the working, fighting, busy thing, and the Allistics, the regular people of the world absolutely define themselves in exactly this way. In fact, the rest of us are a problem for them because we do not log or mine or war hard enough, or to put it in current terms I do not love: they cannot make any money off of us.
.
The next bit the restructuring changed was the âsociopath CEO,â idea, it makes more sense the other way about from here:
.
So we are the primordial soup and Allists are the new fatal mutation that may finish our species along with most of the rest of them â and the worst kind of people, the most dangerous, ought to be locked up sorts are not those with social disabilities, but those with social superpowers, the super-Allistics, the ones who can control thousands or millions of people and do. I mean, there is war and environmental collapse, and there are rich people controlling things, so the two may be one thing: they are making them happen. I know, their theory is they only attempt, but fail to control.
.
Theyâre wrong at the very least, and this is them, âcontrolled.â If they really believed it âdidnât work,â you would expect them to make adjustments and they do not, because in some real way, of course it, âworks.â Everything does something. Itâs reality, not a videogame where some buttons do nothing.
.
This is them, the actual living breathing results of their actual actions, and that they think none of it affects them because they think they would have been this way anyway â again, Iâm sorry, it has to be part of their makeup, right? A thing their brains were not evolved to do, to connect the cause to the effect as regards themselves. âHuman Nature,â may be built into them, the meme, not the Nature.
.
About that, Human Nature.
.
Tacit again perhaps, but the existing framing, the neurotypical framing of the situation is this meme, and the first thing it says is, itâs all Humans, we are all the same, somehow â and then if weâre not, thatâs a problem, a pathology, but there is a grain of truth. Natures arenât a thing, itâs not all humans that the meme fits, but it is a real thing, in its proper place, as is often the case, the bad meme indicates an effort, there is something they have been trying to get at that they are calling Human Nature, and despite they get it wrong, that something does exist.
.
It’s Allistic Nature they are describing.
With the caveat that a more realistic, less creationist version of a âNature,â would be a moving target in the real world of evolution, that creatures do have ways of being, perhaps this is a âNature,â a way of being, but that they simply arenât static or permanent. In evolution, my Nature is a little different from my fatherâs, because evolution, because things change. But I still have my way of being, my Nature, I suppose, which has individual elements, but is largely an Autistic nature â and the Allisticsâ âHuman Nature,â is of course, Allistic Nature.
.
Again, Iâm ignorant, I donât know enough to postulate an ADHD Nature and other sorts, but this is the point, that âNature,â in this sense, means neurotype. There are Autistic Natures, surely Downsâ Syndrome Natures, and Allistic natures and surely others.
.
To make Human Nature, youâd have to add them all together, clearly.
.
In some senses, that is what âHuman Nature,â means, in some contexts it does apparently include every possible trait, as they say, from murder and larceny to selflessness and sacrifice, but this is rhetoric, of course a term that means âanything and everything,â isnât a useful term, and a âNature,â with nothing left out tells us nothing.
.
But a collective Human Nature would add them all together, would need and use every trait. Inasmuch as their Human Nature is supposed to apply to us all, they also pointedly apply the worst elements to us all, they call the traps of their own deficiencies â neurotypes have superpowers and deficiencies â simply âthe Human Condition,â and assure us none can escape. I mean, itâs nice to share your Human Nature with Fred Rogers, not so much with Anthony Bourdain. Much less others that we see on TV a lot.
.
Iâm saying, since Human Nature isnât universal, neither is the Human Condition, that that is only the Allistic Condition. Iâm saying the neurodivergent have the keys to the universal prison of Human Nature, that it is not universal, that indeed humans exist that donât have some of these problems and can show the normal folks the way out of them.
.
It’s a mess, but thatâs the theory.
.
And this is where I am coming from when I speak, I am Autistic, this is the neurodiversity from here, this is the Way It Is to me and while as always, I have pride in myself and my thoughts, I donât think this is what most Autists think â yet, maybe, I hope â they mostly think the stuff with the DEP in it, and that configures as âdifferent but equal,â and seems to accept half of the neurotypical premise when they speak and talks about âAutism,â like itâs a thing and like Allism is just ânormal,â not a definable type.
.
I canât really join any of those conversations and I need yâall to join mine instead.
.
Donât we all, though.
.
Bah. Autistic Nature. Whaddayagonnado. đ
.
Jeff,
Jan. 4th., 2024
When weâre doing the âequal and opposite,â thing, the Double Empathy thing, talking about âAutistic goals and values,â as opposed to NT ones, of course, âvalues,â and âgoals,â are generic, content free, they mean whatever they mean to a reader already, and weâre mostly just telling them whatever they already wanted to hear.
I mean, weâre stuck with it, the NT values we are contrasted against have always been that way, just, âvalues,â you know, good olâ values! Everybody loves values! Think âFamily values,â if youâre not with me yet.
Itâs something I struggle with, fighting generic language is fighting ghosts. They ânever said that,â because they never really said anything. Something has occurred to me this morning of Christmas Eve, though, is that this ploy is working, NT society is keeping its secrets this way, but more, they maintain their theory of neurodiversity this way too because we are stuck with it and play along and start talking about âAutistic values,â so that now it all sounds equal and opposite, when in reality, âAutistic values,â means anything and everything except âAllistic values,â just as Allism and Autism define each other, Allism and Autismâs goals define one another.
Also, just as I place Autism as the entire world and Allism as a new and specific thing, the human warrior caste or something â do keep up, this is our science here, LOL – then so too are Allistic values something very specific, while âAutistic values,â would simply be everything else.
Of course, that isnât right, to put the whole world into a box labelled, âAutistic values,â is it, when we know where they file boxes with that label.
Jeff
Dec. 24th., 2023
These were my post-blog comments online, me putting the raw idea of this in context.
700 words to say Autism is not the new thing in the conversation.
Theories are supposed to make predictions if they want to be heard, and I’m not sure it counts as a prediction, but:
Not saying you can poison a person into Autism, but is you could, if, say Thalidomide caused some percentage of babies to show up with something that even looks like Autism, that this model of Neurodivergence would account for it.
The idea is, that since Allism is the new thing, and a very specific, complex, genetic thing, that it may indeed be susceptible to some poisons or other, that is to say developmental interference, or damage.
We at abusewithanexcuse dot com feel that poisons are unlikely to create or enhance things as complex as neurotype, to create a million neurological and genetic connections that add up to a complete model of a human, but quite likely to harm one, needing only to destroy some link in the chain, and not build an entire new chain.
/2
One big prediction this theory does make, although testing will be impossible, is that they are never going to find the genetic component for “Autism,” because it is not the specific thing, Allism is.
Impossible to test, because they will either say they did or search forever.
/3
/4 was nuthinâ
The theory in the Dawn of Everything, suggests, if I consider my idea of Neurodiversity here, that Allism has been manageable for much of prehistory and in much of the world, that humanity cycles into the patriarchal, conflict lifestyle and back out of it again on a schedule of only three or four hundred years.
But it also talked about a sense in academia that humanity is presently stuck on the dark end, and that perhaps Europe has been for some time.
Just giving you what I got about it . . . đ
/5
I know what I can say, is that this is theory, I am trying to make our own version of the human story and so our own version, or a better version for everyone, of the human sciences – I am trying to create good guy science, non-patriarchal science.
And the point of that blog, to say “Autism was here first,” it seems pointless, but the point of science, the reason we need the scientific high ground is that without it, our answers to the empty threats of the Moms and researchers are empty also – and they rule the world, their empty reasons win.
With this story, with this science, if that’s what it is, we have an answer for the Autism Moms, is my point, with this structure, and them trying to say, “NOW we’re getting all these Autistics (same as they say, “all these gays nowadays,”), and it’s because Tylenol or whatever, we can say, “No, Mom, this here science says YOU are the thing we have NOW, that you are the new thing, that stuff about Autistics, “now,” has been disproven.”
/6
Jeff
Dec. 14th., 2023
Itâs not a completely different story, our origins when we add neurotypes into the theory, possibly the existing story fits whole inside this one, the entire currently held prehistory of our species could be pared down somewhat to be only specifically the prehistory, the genesis of todayâs most apparently common neurotype.
Perhaps the whole Man the War Ape, evo-bro patriarchal story is kind of true and real, if not for all of us, but for one sort, perhaps this is not the story of humanityâs emergence from the general population of animals, but the story of Allisticsâ emergence from the world of non-Allistic animals, humans included. We are still actually animals after all, there is no true line between Earthâs creatures on that fantastic vector, other than every animalâs discernment between their own self and others. Surely the flamingosâ ideology place them as âdifferent,â from the rest of us too, on that basis.
Ah, I like that.
These efforts always look hopeless when I begin but after the first step, the next one becomes available. I like that, and this is what the existence of different neurotypes does for us, it makes it possible to say things about people without having to slip into a world of ideologies where it has to mean, âall people.â âSlip into,â Allistic world, is what that is, perhaps. I think the existing narrative, our currently held prehistory is Allistic, and âall humans,â makes sense to them, itâs a feature or it comes with other features, part of something they evolved for.
It came up online yesterday, and itâs always good to remember because we are hardwired for creationism (trademark, my idea, an AST idea), that if a thing exists in life, it is because evolution has made a case for it in real life, and Allistic people and the things they believe do surely exist.
But, you know, the world is a big place and gets bigger with everything you learn, and time? Donât get me started, LOL. There has been a lot, a lot of time. Just because evolution grows a thing, that donât make it right. Thereâs a lot of horrendous crap out there, parasites and whatnot.
Yes, thatâs right, parasites âout there,â LOL.
Ahem. Never mind.
Not sure itâs coming through, did you get it yourself?
Not a parasite, I mean did you see the structure, the timeline â animals, including humans in our terrible Eden until something changes and the new thing, not âhumans,â like we tell it, but Allistic humans appear, Allistics are the new thing, and not to confuse matters, a new thing, perhaps a sort of a creation, I mean of self-directed evolution, these Allistic humans, perhaps in the existing framework often confused with âmodern humans?â
Snap you back out of the 19th. Century textbook Iâm always writing and back to present day reality â Allistics are new. They are not the forever, proper, intelligently designed Human species, the original, no. They are the new kid on the block. There are not âAutistics now,â as the fascists and fascist adjacent like to say. There always were, everything is Autistic, âAutistic,â apparently defines all the diversity that isnât Allistic.
There are Allistics now, is the point.
Equal and opposite, something is causing these âAutism Moms and Researchers,â and I need a grant. Oh, right. Preliminary evidence, then?
A bit of an insight from writing and talking online last evening, that can we look at the perhaps religious oil execs who ignored the climate, can you look at that probably neurotypical guy, I mean, he doesnât run his industry alone, can you look at that guy and say, âthis seems like a neurotype that has lasted three million years?â
Can you look at the nuclear bomb and say, âthis seems like a neurotype that would last three million years?â To poison the Earth for tens, hundreds of thousands of years to win a three year war? This is the OG, tried and true human neurotype? Three million years and looking forward to three million more?
Isnât it far more likely that this is a new and hardly viable mind that has finished its planet in the evolutionary blink of an eye?
Jeff
Dec. 14th., 2023