Emotional Labour

You know, what I think I’m doing with my divergent theories and my “book,” by complaining about spanking and police, by trying to tell people we are drowning in the toxic byproducts of these behaviours, what I fancy I’m doing is the emotional labour for the whole goddam world.

From my very first formulations, from when I heard someone say, “I hit them, but it doesn’t hurt them,” and I would simply argue – it does! Maybe it doesn’t kill them, but it hurts them. Don’t you know that’s what hitting is for? If it doesn’t hurt them, why hit them? – and that is the definition of emotional labour, explaining to someone that they’re hurting someone, figuring out for them that the hurt they cause is what is coming back to bother them now, in this case perhaps explaining to a parent why their adult child doesn’t speak to them anymore.

Emotional labour is doing someone’s thinking for them in the realm of feelings, right?

But everyone says that, “it doesn’t hurt them,” stuff, at least almost everyone in my white, North American, formerly so also European life – so I’m trying to do it for everyone: it does, you fools. Something is wrong with you, it’s obvious, or it ought to be. It’s what’s coming back to bother you now, in terms of angry fascists the world over melting down into another world war.

You owe me ten million dollars for that judgement, it’s the labour of a lifetime. Labour isn’t free.

That’s real, you aren’t dealing with the bad feelings you ignore with that rather obvious fallacy of consensus lie. You can gaslight your kid, you can all pretend to one another that it’s true – but you can’t gaslight an entire world of repressed childhood righteous rage – that little gem is the product of the emotional labour I have done for you. That’s why I ought to get the big bucks.

Because like in a movie, “Miss Peregrine’s Home for Peculiar Children,” I can see the monsters. That’s a great metaphor for emotional labour, isn’t it, you can’t see it and it will destroy you, you need me.

That’s a trade-off, when you’re the “strong,” one, you farm your emotional work out, like the social sexual dimorphism we have now, Dad is “strong,” so Mom is “loving,” right? Except Mom is often enough “strong,” enough to beat your ass too, and the kids maybe try, but basically no-one is doing humankind’s emotional labour anymore.

I mean, no-one but me of course, but I don’t imagine I’m the last of God’s Fools quite yet.

But y’all are not letting me do it, y’all are not talking the advice or the lessons. I searched for a definition online to give you, but I saw half of them were the very opposite, “workplace emotional labour,” means suppressing and ignoring your feelings, not planning for them – normal people get a lot of things backwards like that – so half of y’all have worse than no concept of what it is, a backwards one, with your salary in the balance of which you choose.

A lot of things – but my goodness, that’s a bad one, redefining the cure as the disease and vice versa.

And here we are again, at the end of another film, “Legend,” with me begging your sort to let me help you, you know, instead of killing everybody.

Jeff

Sept. 17th., 2024

Everything, Just Everything

Every time I talk it’s an infodump because it’s never enough, and I try not to notice in order to avoid catatonia, to keep moving, but it’s the whole world, everything, so it’s only “true,” while I keep talking because it’s not wrong or a lie until you finish – but the second I stop, it was all flawed, incomplete. Garbage.

It’s never enough because we have no common ground, zero.

I saw an image of a social media post today where some man asked, “If there were no men, who would protect you?” and some clever women responded, “From who?” – and this is true of all of it, the government and their army, the police, “protecting us,” – from who?

There is always some mythical enemy in most of what they say, everything is geared against some, “them,” no matter what they’re talking about, whether there really is any such group or even could be, still, some “they,” are always to be prepared for.

There is hate at the bottom of it, not towards anyone specific in the here and now, maybe, but still,  you know they’re coming: people. “They,” are people, the enemy is people, and you’re not one of us if you don’t intuitively grasp this . . . I know. It sounds crazy; it’s a mobius strip of logic, you’re not one of us unless you hate . . . us. I’m telling you though, nothing else fits.

I mean, “us,” gets parsed, us, but not you, I like you. So we’re innocent of “hating people,” if we like any of them.

It’s everything.

This species hates itself and it is committing a global murder suicide, clearly we have had enough and we can’t take it anymore.

Everyone hates child abusers, in prison, the worst sorts can feel good about themselves when they speak of child abusers – but there’s a trick, the Monkey’s Paw surprise: spanking doesn’t count. No-one is a child abuser because hitting them doesn’t count. You don’t think people hate people?

Imagine hating dogs so much that you beat puppies.

Imagine everybody understands if you do!

Not a thing, because people don’t hate dogs like that. Right?

I’m not making moral judgements, there’s no power there, morality to this animal means punishment, which is abuse, I do not wish to impress this creature in terms of its “morality.” I’m saying it’s suicide, that’s not a moral issue for me, your life is yours to lose if you prefer. But that’s what’s going on: you think people are the enemy, so you’re killing them all, even your doctors and the people who grow your food.

It’s ironic, just short of funny when this species speaks of good and life and then goes home to beat its children: the children and the world feel what you do, and you can make the children forget, or force a recontextualization upon them about it – but you can’t talk the world out of it. There are consequences. It is always sad to hear of some plan to do some good: it doesn’t matter what little good you do if all the children are raised in a violent crucible where the adults prove to each of them that people are the enemy because if even Dad and Mom attack you, what else are we to think?

Of course people hate people if human caregivers attack human children.

What other outcome could we possibly imagine?

In the end, the “help,” is extremely limited, hobbled by the “normal,” business of hating and competing with people instead and the hate is the main revenue stream: the help are the gratuities, the sort of help that changes nothing.

I’m sure you’re arguing, I don’t hate people!

This almost certainly happened to you. You were almost certainly a young child with some sense of your rights that got spanked, so of COURSE you hate people, if you don’t seem to feel it, it should still be your first guess about how you feel because OF COURSE. How not? Why wouldn’t you?

If you don’t hate people after that, I’m offended and I demand to know why, what is wrong with you. Isn’t that probably the Oedipus complex? I’m not the first to suggest there are inherent conflicts in human life, am I?

Even the most violent prisoners hate child abusers, but not your very young self? Am I to assume that we are born thinking that violence to our own young self is “not abuse?”

One, I don’t want to believe it, even about Allistic people, but for the same reason I don’t want to, what’s the point in believing it? Where’s the hope, what’s to be done if that’s the case? That’s like Dark Tribbles, Well, Jim, near as I can tell, they’re born killers! Case closed.

Two, my logical problem with it is, then, so you’re saying spanking does nothing? And again, how does anything do nothing, and why wouldn’t it, and OF COURSE it does something.

And show me your list of all the other things that everyone does all day because it does nothing, what else do we do because it doesn’t “do anything?”

But is it sort of magic, the way it is self-operating, isn’t it, if you’re spanked you have a reason to hate people, if you hate people, maybe spanking – child abuse – seems OK to you – we do it because we do it. Right? That’s hard to argue away, a circle that tight. It’s not something we were argued into, as the meme goes. In this sense, of no change from generation to generation, it sort of “doesn’t do anything,” in that we’ve done it for a very long time and it doesn’t appear to change anything anymore.

But not doing it would have to be “doing something,” then, I suppose, I mean, that’s what I think, that’s often when we find out that what we were doing was indeed “doing something,” making other things happen, when we change – again, falling into the analogy of the psychology of addiction. Also like that though, is we also already knew it all deep down already, sort of, but seeing is a different level of believing, when we change.

Or so I hear.

Jeff

Sept. 5th., 2024

The Autistic and the Blade One, Update: new blog just for it.

I’ve written a short book, the one I’ve been threatening to, I think I’ve stated the idea in a few blogs, I’ve adapted Riane Eisler’s “The Chalice and the Blade,” for spanking and for Neurotype, to rename her social models Neurological Types, Neurotypes instead, and to try to trace the spread of the type and the genes for what Dr. Eisler calls the Dominators, the people “following the Dominator social model,” in their words, through prehistory and history, following their book.

“Normal people,” in mine, Neurotypical people.

I’m trying to let some time pass before I put it on this popular site, I’ve only just finished and just warned Dr. Eisler’s website that I’m up to this, I suppose I’ll give them next week to stop me, of course I don’t expect an answer.

Jeff

Aug. 9th., 2024

Here it is:

https://thespankinggene.blog/

Brutal ND Theory

Before all the normal people get upset, realize that the people representing all you nice normal folks to us Autistics are the Tylenol Moms who want to make sure none of us are ever born again, and the ABA practitioners who torture us as children, realize that I am not throwing the first punches here, not by a long shot.

As brutal as I am about to be regarding your sort, I’m just talking, so you got nothing moral to say to anybody about it until the hate and the torture stops.

 Allism is Human Nature, whether evil, or flawed, or “with a legacy of our ape past,” and with its common fallacies and biases. Allism is caused by spanking, an environment of threat and violence sets Allistic children’s “warrior genes,” to fight mode, making them aggressive. Allistic parents do this consciously, feeling that if their child is more aggressive than the next, that they will have a better life than the next.

Everything about Allistic life centres on this binary, self and Other, they all place themselves among some hostile Other, and justify their aggression by projecting it onto everyone else, they are somehow All the Same, but also Alone in an Hostile World. Allism means the Other is wrong, and also the they are the same, with Allism, we are ALL wrong.

With everything to do with Allism, it gets a smaller name and a smaller explanation, it is only some people, only our people, so for Europeans it is CHRISTIAN We Are All Wrong, Original Sin. I think in the east it is the Buddha who says All Life is Sorrow and we are wrong to still be here. In ancient Egypt, I guess all deserved to die and rot unless they had the earthly power to preserve their earthly bodies for all time, surely there was something wrong with all of them too.

The aggression seems to be the point, both consciously and unconsciously, but along with, whether this makes total logical sense to you, or if it’s only one of those things, you change one genetic thing you get many changes, like they learned with the foxes – other neurological things change. Like they are somehow opposed to evolution, and cannot learn it, and so are entirely non-viable.

If not understanding the world as well as the average wild animal does and so living in constant violent conflict with the world is the price of this adaptation of aggression, then we ought to let it go, go back to being passive, but, it’s a conundrum. “Be less strong,” simply does not compute for them, that is their bottom line, or they think it is, which means the same thing (do you kids understand that expression anymore, does not compute? It means a not sane command, an un-followable instruction for an old TV robot. Nonsense. A command it has no program for).  There does not appear to be hardware support for saying No to Strong in the Allistic brain. At least they don’t let it out into the world if there is.

The best I hear is, Strong AND good things, but that’s clearly not how this gene works. They are making a choice.

About The Chalice and the Blade:

Ten to seven thousand years ago, they turned their back on not some fictional Goddess, but on evolution, on nature and reality. The supremacy of the blade and the stories of spontaneous “creation,” utterly disconnected from any logic or reality,* were the beginning of the end. They insist that things work how they do not and they are not blind to the failure, they seem to see the end coming, but they are utterly blind to their part in it, and to any other possibility.

Simple like that.

Spanking causes Allism, Allism is actuarially R-worded and cannot see natural causality, like spanking, and so it’s over. That sort of a circle is a blind alley and a dead end. This spanked creature learned that words mean nothing and violence is the only logic before they could talk, you try to teach them, they fight you instead, always winning and never learning a goddam thing.

Sometimes I get angry, it’s ultimately frustrating, and declare that they deserve what they are about to get, but of course, every other living creature on this rock doesn’t, and anyway, what’d that guy say, Deserve’s got nothing to do with it. “Deserve,” is part of the lethal mutation that some of us, your humble author, don’t have and aren’t supposed to talk about.

My apologies.

Jeff

July 29th., 2024

The Wall

So, there are five blind men, trying to identify an elephant.

Why is this the job of blind men? Well, for the purposes of the story, let’s say this is the whole town, everyone is blind, and hey, why not the whole world? It will still work, as long as you and I, Dear Reader, are still in this world and not in the story. It is a blind world and a blind little town, and these are the scientists among this blind population, these five. Why five? Well the elephant is an unknown, no-one knew which to call and simply called them all, I assume they must all have their own areas of expertise.

These five have lives and do not live together, so when they are called and come to inspect the new thing, they come from all around, and each approaches the thing from a different direction. The nearest and first to arrive encounters the tail of the beast and proposes that someone has hung a rope here but is no longer about to claim or explain it. The next one comes up beside the first, touches the elephant’s leg and says, Rope, what rope, this is a tree, while another meets the animal head on and declares that the town has been invaded by a huge snake.

A fourth scholar upon arrival finds an ear and has a theory, it is a great fan for some reason, I’m sorry, I only repeat the story, I wasn’t there. I don’t know how trees or fans just walk into town or suddenly appear – look, it’s not the point, OK?

Anyway, the last of the five appears with some pomp – apparently he was waiting in order to show up last – and broadsides the beast at full walking speed. Embarrassed and rubbing his nose, he bellows, What are you all talking about, it’s a bloody wall!

By now, a crowd has gathered and there is some quiet laughter and chatter going on. The other four examiners double checked and reiterated themselves, Sorry, no, it’s a rope, a fan, a tree, a snake.

Run, you fools! Shouted the one at the front. A snake this thick and standing this tall can surely eat people! But the other four were unmoved, assured of their own perceptions, and honest with himself, that scholar had to admit that the snake had not grabbed him, or demonstrated any aggression and all remained debating the situation, but the latest arrival, Mr. Wall, let us say, turned to address the crowd.

The wall broke my nose! It’s a hazard! He declared. No-one has been eaten by any snake, and ropes don’t break your nose by just hanging, and trees and giant fans don’t simply appear out of no-where, someone has built a wall!

He waved off the objections of his peers, still addressing the people hanging about. Are you going to wait until you break your noses too? He waded into the crowd, taking people’s hands and having them feel his swollen nose.

Ouch! said some empath, No, we don’t want that! What are those other guys thinking? At this, Mr. Wall grew serious. That’s a good question, he said, and honestly, I can’t explain it. They seem to have taken leave of their senses, don’t they? What sort of perversion turns a wall into a snake?

The buzz of the onlookers dropped an octave as well. Was there something wrong about the other scholars? Were they lying? Someone wondered, was this the first time? What other things have these four been telling us about? As these noises increased, the erroneous four melted into the background and made an escape, saying to one another, I may not know from walls, but I know from angry crowds, I’m out.

It happened that soon after the event that the wall disappeared, along with a great quantity of produce from the stalls along the town’s main street, and so with further study impossible, the wall incident passed into history. Mr. Wall made great hay and fame off of it, he would be the Father of Wallology, while three of the other four saw their reputations suffer and their departments’ budgets shrink, and they faded into retirement.

Mr. Snake published a somewhat successful book about the missing produce, which phenomenon happened a few more times, although no-one felt a wall during those events, so no-one paid much attention.

It would be the Age of Walls now, and dissenters would find themselves on the wrong side of it.

Jeff

March 7th., 2024

Jeff’s Autistic Theory of Neurodiversity

First, all creatures, or most creatures would qualify as “Autistic,” in this theory, it begins with an assumption that all creatures’ neurology is diverse, every which way, within and without orders, families, genus or species, and that most are specific and quirky, and that “Autism,” is not a type, due to it’s diversity, rather, that “Autism,” is the diversity, from which has spring a new type, making humans different from the rest of the creatures fairly recently in geological terms, and the new type is the Allistic Human, with its rather specific typing and neurology.

.

I’m afraid I do not know enough about other sorts of neurotype, ADHD, etc., to be clear, but they are likely also a part of the Primal Diversity, TM, and not the new thing, because of the nature of the actual new thing which would restrict the diversity generally.

.

This framing is a reversal of the existing, perhaps tacit framing, the Neurotypical framing of the situation in which they are the original sort of human and the rest of the neurotypes are spinning off from them, this is clearly not their trend, to create diversity, but to restrict it, so the idea that Autists, etc., are something new is sort of impossible, we see a history of humanity fighting and burying the new and strange, not creatively throwing up options – that’s actual nature that does that, evolution that does that – and it did already, the world didn’t begin recently.

.

The new development, Allism, is an aggressive, dangerous, self-selecting genetic thing, dare I say, a fatal mutation that has destroyed the environment upon which it depended in no more than a few hundred thousand years, maybe in only a few tens of thousands of years, maybe even in only a single ten of thousands of years.

.

The evidences we see for humankind’s specific footprint upon the world are very recent and everyone always talks about ‘civilization,’ as something new – except NT civilization still thinks it’s the original form, somehow.

.

It must be built in, part of the type, and difficult not to think it for them.

.

This is a thing that I will predict, that if it ever occurs to them to search for Allistic genes, or to notice the ones they’ve already found, they will find them appearing at these scales of time, perhaps where the fossil record records changes, beginning maybe when fire was harnessed, and then at three hundred thousand years ago and/or at thirty thousand years ago (these numbers from Wrangham, The Goodness Paradox).

.

Maybe even less, I’m open. The evidences of wars would seem like a pointer.

.

That’s about it.

.

This much seems self-evident, by their own myths, history and pre-history:

.

It is the human warrior neurotype, Allism is, and as such, much of their “human science,” is skewed towards aggression and “control,” of something, perhaps also the  most natural sort of thought for the type, and they want to say that they are the original sort of human being, but the rapidity of the destruction suggests otherwise, does this madness look like it could have lasted three million years to you? This attitude? I think we all know, it’s come to its conclusion far sooner than that as warriors’ plans always do.

.

This was the first bit of restructuring this idea brought me, it explains the existence of these several neurotypes in a way that fits our evolution in terms of what we do know of history and pre-history, because the world a million years ago wasn’t constant war and environmental destruction and it is now, so the new thing is the active thing, the working, fighting, busy thing, and the Allistics, the regular people of the world absolutely define themselves in exactly this way. In fact, the rest of us are a problem for them because we do not log or mine or war hard enough, or to put it in current terms I do not love: they cannot make any money off of us.

.

The next bit the restructuring changed was the “sociopath CEO,” idea, it makes more sense the other way about from here:

.

So we are the primordial soup and Allists are the new fatal mutation that may finish our species along with most of the rest of them – and the worst kind of people, the most dangerous, ought to be locked up sorts are not those with social disabilities, but those with social superpowers, the super-Allistics, the ones who can control thousands or millions of people and do. I mean, there is war and environmental collapse, and there are rich people controlling things, so the two may be one thing: they are making them happen. I know, their theory is they only attempt, but fail to control.

.

They’re wrong at the very least, and this is them, “controlled.” If they really believed it “didn’t work,” you would expect them to make adjustments and they do not, because in some real way, of course it, “works.” Everything does something. It’s reality, not a videogame where some buttons do nothing.

.

This is them, the actual living breathing results of their actual actions, and that they think none of it affects them because they think they would have been this way anyway – again, I’m sorry, it has to be part of their makeup, right? A thing their brains were not evolved to do, to connect the cause to the effect as regards themselves. “Human Nature,” may be built into them, the meme, not the Nature.

.

About that, Human Nature.

.

Tacit again perhaps, but the existing framing, the neurotypical framing of the situation is this meme, and the first thing it says is, it’s all Humans, we are all the same, somehow – and then if we’re not, that’s a problem, a pathology, but there is a grain of truth. Natures aren’t a thing, it’s not all humans that the meme fits, but it is a real thing, in its proper place, as is often the case, the bad meme indicates an effort, there is something they have been trying to get at that they are calling Human Nature, and despite they get it wrong, that something does exist.

.

It’s Allistic Nature they are describing.

With the caveat that a more realistic, less creationist version of a “Nature,” would be a moving target in the real world of evolution, that creatures do have ways of being, perhaps this is a “Nature,” a way of being, but that they simply aren’t static or permanent. In evolution, my Nature is a little different from my father’s, because evolution, because things change. But I still have my way of being, my Nature, I suppose, which has individual elements, but is largely an Autistic nature – and the Allistics’ “Human Nature,” is of course, Allistic Nature.

.

Again, I’m ignorant, I don’t know enough to postulate an ADHD Nature and other sorts, but this is the point, that “Nature,” in this sense, means neurotype. There are Autistic Natures, surely Downs’ Syndrome Natures, and Allistic natures and surely others.

.

To make Human Nature, you’d have to add them all together, clearly.

.

In some senses, that is what “Human Nature,” means, in some contexts it does apparently include every possible trait, as they say, from murder and larceny to selflessness and sacrifice, but this is rhetoric, of course a term that means “anything and everything,” isn’t a useful term, and a “Nature,” with nothing left out tells us nothing.

.

But a collective Human Nature would add them all together, would need and use every trait. Inasmuch as their Human Nature is supposed to apply to us all, they also pointedly apply the worst elements to us all, they call the traps of their own deficiencies – neurotypes have superpowers and deficiencies – simply ‘the Human Condition,’ and assure us none can escape. I mean, it’s nice to share your Human Nature with Fred Rogers, not so much with Anthony Bourdain. Much less others that we see on TV a lot.

.

I’m saying, since Human Nature isn’t universal, neither is the Human Condition, that that is only the Allistic Condition. I’m saying the neurodivergent have the keys to the universal prison of Human Nature, that it is not universal, that indeed humans exist that don’t have some of these problems and can show the normal folks the way out of them.

.

It’s a mess, but that’s the theory.

.

And this is where I am coming from when I speak, I am Autistic, this is the neurodiversity from here, this is the Way It Is to me and while as always, I have pride in myself and my thoughts, I don’t think this is what most Autists think – yet, maybe, I hope – they mostly think the stuff with the DEP in it, and that configures as ‘different but equal,’ and seems to accept half of the neurotypical premise when they speak and talks about ‘Autism,’ like it’s a thing and like Allism is just ‘normal,’ not a definable type.

.

I can’t really join any of those conversations and I need y’all to join mine instead.

.

Don’t we all, though.

.

Bah. Autistic Nature. Whaddayagonnado. 😉

.

Jeff,

Jan. 4th., 2024

Equal and Opposite

When we’re doing the “equal and opposite,” thing, the Double Empathy thing, talking about “Autistic goals and values,” as opposed to NT ones, of course, “values,” and “goals,” are generic, content free, they mean whatever they mean to a reader already, and we’re mostly just telling them whatever they already wanted to hear.

I mean, we’re stuck with it, the NT values we are contrasted against have always been that way, just, “values,’ you know, good ol’ values! Everybody loves values! Think “Family values,” if you’re not with me yet.

It’s something I struggle with, fighting generic language is fighting ghosts. They “never said that,” because they never really said anything. Something has occurred to me this morning of Christmas Eve, though, is that this ploy is working, NT society is keeping its secrets this way, but more, they maintain their theory of neurodiversity this way too because we are stuck with it and play along and start talking about “Autistic values,” so that now it all sounds equal and opposite, when in reality, “Autistic values,” means anything and everything except “Allistic values,” just as Allism and Autism define each other, Allism and Autism’s goals define one another.

Also, just as I place Autism as the entire world and Allism as a new and specific thing, the human warrior caste or something – do keep up, this is our science here, LOL – then so too are Allistic values something very specific, while “Autistic values,” would simply be everything else.

Of course, that isn’t right, to put the whole world into a box labelled, “Autistic values,” is it, when we know where they file boxes with that label.

Jeff

Dec. 24th., 2023

The Shape of Things, Part Two

These were my post-blog comments online, me putting the raw idea of this in context.

700 words to say Autism is not the new thing in the conversation.

Theories are supposed to make predictions if they want to be heard, and I’m not sure it counts as a prediction, but:

Not saying you can poison a person into Autism, but is you could, if, say Thalidomide caused some percentage of babies to show up with something that even looks like Autism, that this model of Neurodivergence would account for it.

The idea is, that since Allism is the new thing, and a very specific, complex, genetic thing, that it may indeed be susceptible to some poisons or other, that is to say developmental interference, or damage.

We at abusewithanexcuse dot com feel that poisons are unlikely to create or enhance things as complex as neurotype, to create a million neurological and genetic connections that add up to a complete model of a human, but quite likely to harm one, needing only to destroy some link in the chain, and not build an entire new chain.

 /2

One big prediction this theory does make, although testing will be impossible, is that they are never going to find the genetic component for “Autism,” because it is not the specific thing, Allism is.

Impossible to test, because they will either say they did or search forever.

/3

/4 was nuthin’

The theory in the Dawn of Everything, suggests, if I consider my idea of Neurodiversity here, that Allism has been manageable for much of prehistory and in much of the world, that humanity cycles into the patriarchal, conflict lifestyle and back out of it again on a schedule of only three or four hundred years.

But it also talked about a sense in academia that humanity is presently stuck on the dark end, and that perhaps Europe has been for some time.

Just giving you what I got about it . . . 😇

/5

I know what I can say, is that this is theory, I am trying to make our own version of the human story and so our own version, or a better version for everyone, of the human sciences – I am trying to create good guy science, non-patriarchal science.

And the point of that blog, to say “Autism was here first,” it seems pointless, but the point of science, the reason we need the scientific high ground is that without it, our answers to the empty threats of the Moms and researchers are empty also – and they rule the world, their empty reasons win.

With this story, with this science, if that’s what it is, we have an answer for the Autism Moms, is my point, with this structure, and them trying to say, “NOW we’re getting all these Autistics (same as they say, “all these gays nowadays,”), and it’s because Tylenol or whatever, we can say, “No, Mom, this here science says YOU are the thing we have NOW, that you are the new thing, that stuff about Autistics, “now,” has been disproven.”

/6

Jeff

Dec. 14th., 2023

The Shape of Things

It’s not a completely different story, our origins when we add neurotypes into the theory, possibly the existing story fits whole inside this one, the entire currently held prehistory of our species could be pared down somewhat to be only specifically the prehistory, the genesis of today’s most apparently common neurotype.

Perhaps the whole Man the War Ape, evo-bro patriarchal story is kind of true and real, if not for all of us, but for one sort, perhaps this is not the story of humanity’s emergence from the general population of animals, but the story of Allistics’ emergence from the world of non-Allistic animals, humans included. We are still actually animals after all, there is no true line between Earth’s creatures on that fantastic vector, other than every animal’s discernment between their own self and others. Surely the flamingos’ ideology place them as “different,” from the rest of us too, on that basis.

Ah, I like that.

These efforts always look hopeless when I begin but after the first step, the next one becomes available. I like that, and this is what the existence of different neurotypes does for us, it makes it possible to say things about people without having to slip into a world of ideologies where it has to mean, “all people.” “Slip into,” Allistic world, is what that is, perhaps. I think the existing narrative, our currently held prehistory is Allistic, and “all humans,” makes sense to them, it’s a feature or it comes with other features, part of something they evolved for.

It came up online yesterday, and it’s always good to remember because we are hardwired for creationism (trademark, my idea, an AST idea), that if a thing exists in life, it is because evolution has made a case for it in real life, and Allistic people and the things they believe do surely exist.

But, you know, the world is a big place and gets bigger with everything you learn, and time? Don’t get me started, LOL. There has been a lot, a lot of time. Just because evolution grows a thing, that don’t make it right. There’s a lot of horrendous crap out there, parasites and whatnot.

Yes, that’s right, parasites “out there,” LOL.

Ahem. Never mind.

Not sure it’s coming through, did you get it yourself?

Not a parasite, I mean did you see the structure, the timeline – animals, including humans in our terrible Eden until something changes and the new thing, not “humans,” like we tell it, but Allistic humans appear, Allistics are the new thing, and not to confuse matters, a new thing, perhaps a sort of a creation, I mean of self-directed evolution, these Allistic humans, perhaps in the existing framework often confused with ‘modern humans?’

Snap you back out of the 19th. Century textbook I’m always writing and back to present day reality – Allistics are new. They are not the forever, proper, intelligently designed Human species, the original, no. They are the new kid on the block. There are not “Autistics now,” as the fascists and fascist adjacent like to say. There always were, everything is Autistic, “Autistic,” apparently defines all the diversity that isn’t Allistic.

There are Allistics now, is the point.

Equal and opposite, something is causing these ‘Autism Moms and Researchers,’ and I need a grant. Oh, right. Preliminary evidence, then?

A bit of an insight from writing and talking online last evening, that can we look at the perhaps religious oil execs who ignored the climate, can you look at that probably neurotypical guy, I mean, he doesn’t run his industry alone, can you look at that guy and say, “this seems like a neurotype that has lasted three million years?”

Can you look at the nuclear bomb and say, “this seems like a neurotype that would last three million years?” To poison the Earth for tens, hundreds of thousands of years to win a three year war? This is the OG, tried and true human neurotype? Three million years and looking forward to three million more?

Isn’t it far more likely that this is a new and hardly viable mind that has finished its planet in the evolutionary blink of an eye?

Jeff

Dec. 14th., 2023

Super-Allists, or Actuarial Psychology, Part Two

The problem ones have social gifts and rational disabilities, not the other way about. I am postulating, in lieu of our sociopath CEO’s a sort of a super-Allist.

“Normal,” to the point of disorder.

I want to revisit the definitions of the antisocial neurotypes mentioned in the first, psychopathy and APD and say that from my own social . . . situation, OK, disorder, from my perhaps asocial neurotype, I want to say that a psycho- or sociopath being charming and succeeding socially doesn’t look different than anyone else being charming and succeeding socially. Honestly, when Allists are speaking among themselves and charming and succeeding with one another, I don’t always understand it, so it doesn’t necessarily always seem authentic and organic to me.

I suppose if there were a sociopath in the group saying the same things and responding appropriately and succeeding in the group, I wouldn’t see any difference at all. And . . . not sure this is cool to say, I’m uh . . . I don’t see how anyone would, I mean if I could grok how anyone knows the difference, I suppose I could do it too. If they are saying and apparently feeling the same things, what is different?

Social success is social success, everyone has to fake it – and you don’t build it for yourself. If a predatory psychopath has a lot of social success, that’s on their whole group, not just them! “Social success,” is not an individual achievement, is it?

Ah there it is, popped up and surprised me – our “psychopath CEOs,” are hypersocial if they over-achieve, more social than the regular Allists, who all seem hypersocial to my sort to begin with. If this is “cold, calculating manipulation,” then their whole crew is almost as good at it as they are, I mean, then cold, calculating manipulation is what brings social success, at least in that group.

But the point, already made without saying so, I’m afraid, is that a monster’s social success is as real as anybody’s, and it comes from their social group – so was everybody, “pretending?” And if so, what’s the difference between that and everyone not pretending, if they’re all doing and saying the same scripts?

I want to shut up and write a book instead. In my world, this is an automatic pop-psych Number One best seller, and I’m giving it away to nobody for free.

Jeff

Nov. 22nd., 2023