Tangents – Thoughts about Hate and Neurotype(departing from Morality, Part Five)

Hey, I’m sorry. I’m mocking your neurotype, that’s not cool, I know. I’m trying to cheat a little, shock you into listening. This is the thing that normal folks have a hard time seeing, I’m sorry, I ought to know it’s not going to help insulting you about it. Let’s pick the parental version apart a little.

“Sure I hit them, but it doesn’t hurt them,” is clearly OK in the majority neurotype brain, isn’t it, and I suppose I can try to understand, I mean, it “doesn’t hurt them,” not more than it does every other kid, it really “doesn’t hurt them,” developmentally – compared to every other kid, and you can look around you and see this much is true. It’s true, in a way, in a socially understood, Allistic, comparative way, if not so much in my self understanding, Autistic way, where comparisons aren’t so much the point and everyone hit and hurt the same way is different than everyone not hit and hurt the same way. The ”same,” part, again, is Allistic, that’s the point of everything in group life, same is important, and hurt isn’t all bad, makes you strong – while us all being in the same boat is no comfort to my less social mind, and everyone being hurt is infinitely worse than if no-one were, despite the company.

It looks like the social mind is at odds with the sociological mind, with the actuarial sense, and this is some prioritization in the evolution of the Allistic human, one I would review, but it would seem we’ve lost the Administration password, another convenient thing about the human in Allistic mode, is it thinks it’s perfect or something.

Don’t you find that amazing about the haters of the world, that they can be so harsh in their discriminations, it’s like white men think white men are gods or something, and heterosexuals think they’ve invented a free eternal power source. From my neurology, I don’t understand how you form sentences from such attitudes, like there is nothing wrong with men, or nothing wrong with white men, or nothing wrong with people if they’re straight – have the haters ever met any people at all?

Who have you ever met that made you think, “That’s it, no more people, this guy is perfect?” And how old are you? I really don’t get it, I’m as arrogant an aspie prick as you’d ever care to meet, but I do not worship myself as flawless, and I would not populate a world with nothing but my weird self.

We’re all some awful flawed Human Nature, never to be cured in this world – but in the next conversation there would be no problems at all if only they were all white and straight and male – sorry, I’m mocking again, I think? Can you tell? The presupposition in all the hateisms seems to be something just that unrealistic, doesn’t it? Not so much? I think it’s along the lines of a disability, like neurotype stuff, if you need a gene for hate for some reason, then you won’t be needing this one for self-critique, that would be counterproductive for both these genes, right?

Sorry.

Jeff

Sept. 16th., 2023

One thought on “Tangents – Thoughts about Hate and Neurotype(departing from Morality, Part Five)

  1. Jeff/neighsayer's avatar Jeff/neighsayer September 18, 2023 / 2:25 pm

    Hmmm . . . so that’s what “I got whupped and I”M fine,” means, to the Allistic it means, “I got whupped and I’m the same as everybody else,” and again, we can look around and see that this is true as far as it goes.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *