If we consider what I’ve labelled as the ‘consequences meme’ that captures the most common parenting methods and attitudes and try to glean what goals it may serve, the first and most basic thing offered by it appears to be control. Here’s the way I’ve been expressing it so far:
. . . that story, about what must happen and how consequences make it happen and about how what must happen might never happen without our consequences . . .
Clearly, whatever must happen, whatever the consequences, and considering that it won’t happen by itself, the theme is control. If we bring the consequences, the meme says we get things the way we want, right? That’s the meme, the story we tell ourselves, and the form of the meme may be sane – sane, meaning a calculation that is possible to make, not that the answer is correct, only that we are not attempting to divide by zero or something – and that suffices, again, within this metaphor and using the metaphor’s special rules of logic. One way the power of the meme is evident is that when real, specific things are inserted into the form –
. . . this story, about eating this food and how a pat on the butt makes it happen and about how this food might never get eaten without that pat on the butt . . .
– that clear, true examples that prove the meme are relevant, evidence for, while clear, true examples that contradict it somehow lack the relevance to change the conversation. Whether a given consequence works out or not, that is success or failure of our consequences, of our attempted application of the meme, but the meme has accomplished its goals if we simply still believe it in either case: a meme is a bias. It’s almost the application of science, or big data, because the meme insures that we are not always changing our minds with every situation, that we stay the course regardless of ‘anecdotal’ individual experiences that would appear to disprove the idea. Almost, you’ll note. It’s analogous to science, but the difference is the criteria: again, the meme serves our goals, not necessarily science or truth.
The function of this meme in our lives would appear to be to give us a sense of control, one that is bolstered against our experiences of things often being out of our control. The function of that sense of control is that we bring the consequences and trust in them implicitly, often to the point that we don’t monitor the results and don’t adjust our methods. The function of the consequences?
That is the mystery, the truth behind the metaphor, and the basis for a better one. To describe that, I’m going to back up, take a different tack. Not a secret, I’ve said it a few times this year, but I want to let this out in bite size pieces. Metaphors are too big too deal with in one sitting.
Mar. 5th., 2017
Here’s the whole series:
and a bonus nipple-twister:
This makes me think of George Lakoff’s work. Have we discussed it before?
Click to access lakoff.thinking-points-ch-4-5-6.pdf
daresay I’m looking at a deeper function than he is, but yeah, same sort of idea about different sorts of logic within different paradigms. (That’s another word to use that I’ve been forgetting.)
I wasn’t sure how Lakoff’s parenting metaphors might relate. I was throwing it out there. Lakoff is connecting the metaphorical, ideological, cultural, and the social through how we portray families and parenting. Like me, he is arguing that such metaphors are always about much more than they first appear to be about and that this always involves the social order.
LikeLiked by 1 person
just the one book sounded less global and more, uh, manageable than what I think I’m after, but yeah, same function, and also yeah, they hide the real deal. Layers and layers, that’s the name of the game, complexity, right?
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’ll have a look. All I remember about him right now is the name.