Punishment: a Self-fulfilling Prophecy and the Roots of Institutionalized Racism

“You beat a man with a whip, and he likes the whip.” I always love an opportunity to quote Charlie Manson. Or Vince Bugliosi anyway. I suppose we could still ask Charlie if he said it, but could we believe his answer? Bugliosi is still alive too, but sources aren’t important to me. I’m all about content. If a swine like Manson says something clever, I appreciate it. Moving on.

Separating the times when punishment has been a cause from the times when it has been an effect is no simple thing, along the lines of the chicken and the egg, except not so easy. We punish a person when they’re bad, but the well-intended abuse that is punishment can all too often have the effect all abuse has, the same effect the kind with bad intentions has. It makes people bad. To some degree or other, of course. Many recipients of punishment and/or abuse may never act it out. But it happens, and when it does, which came first, chicken or egg? When a person is bad, is the badness originating from their deep, original self, or is it a reaction to abuse, either well or badly intended?

Another analogy, supplied by another clever criminal: “If you’re really sick, you might take a lot of medications, but the reverse is also true: if you take a lot of medications, you will be really sick.” It’s a paraphrase from Kevin Trudeau. He’s a huckster and a shyster, but that is no lie. He backs it up with this: “All drugs are toxic. Don’t believe me? Take forty of anything.” Please don’t test the truth of that one. (I can’t remember if Kevin offered that warning.) But the analogy is apt: if you’re bad, you will receive a lot of punishing, but the reverse is also true: if you take a lot of punishments, you may be really bad. This is why it’s so hard to separate the effects from the causes: a punished person becomes bad, in effect proving the punisher’s case. The more we punish a person, the more they appear to “need” it, or “deserve” it.

This function can work on an individual level – Manson self-reports a childhood of very few happy moments – but it works at a social level as well. If a group or a subgroup of people are disproportionately punished, the effect of that abuse, well or badly intended, will make them bad, again, sadly appearing to “prove” the punishing subgroup’s case, reinforcing the appearance of the need to punish forever. Perhaps this is the correct context in which to see the recent events in Missouri, and the racist conflicts in America generally. It is a racial problem certainly, but I think the older problem, the pre-existing condition for this travesty lies in the abusive nature of punishing. Certainly there are a lot of ruined white lives as well, overly punished and abused white criminals that we should also wonder what came first, the chicken of their adult criminality or the egg of their childhood abuse and punishment.

Of course, we need to seriously question what came first with the disproportionately punished and incarcerated members of America’s black population, the chicken of their disenfranchised frustration, rage and desperation, or the egg of their marginal status in society. Of course this situation also informs the other current events tragedies of the moment, the dysfunctional relationship between the Israelis and their Palestinian citizens, and between the Canadian state and Canada’s aboriginals. Punishment and crime exist in a feedback loop, and of course, as always the real solution is love, not pain.

And just to be really, really clear: the egg came first.

Advertisements

9 thoughts on “Punishment: a Self-fulfilling Prophecy and the Roots of Institutionalized Racism

  1. rmwmfcqme@gmail.com September 22, 2014 / 5:47 am

    Thanks for the auspicious writeup. It in truth was once a leisure account it. Glance advanced to far brought agreeable from you! By the way, how can we be in contact?

    Like

    • neighsayer September 22, 2014 / 8:50 am

      we can talk right here, why not?

      Thanks for reading!

      Like

  2. Freedom November 27, 2014 / 2:33 pm

    So the question I have for you, coming from the cop again. Do you believe in law or the rule of law? If someone commits a crime, and I am not talking about minor crimes. I am talking about serious crimes such as rape, arson, or murder; do you believe there should be a punishment for them, no matter their race?

    Like

    • neighsayer November 27, 2014 / 2:44 pm

      Actually, I do not. It only makes people meaner, same as abuse. We may have to lock them up, but prison should be nice too, not abusive. Abuse is not rehab.

      Like

    • neighsayer November 27, 2014 / 5:15 pm

      Surely you’ve noticed, or you at least suspect that the deterrents aren’t working, at least not often enough?

      Like

    • Benjamin David Steele January 5, 2016 / 5:57 pm

      The problem, as any informed person knows, is that minorities are stopped, charged, arrested, and imprisoned at higher rates for many crimes that whites commit at equal or higher rates. The other problem that the informed know is that studies have shown that recent incarceration rates have had little or no correlation to crime rates. Violent crime has been going down in cities and countries, no matter what their crime policies, no matter if they increased or decreased incarceration. The cause is probably environmental regulations of lead pollution, but that is another discussion.

      Liked by 1 person

  3. Benjamin David Steele January 5, 2016 / 5:53 pm

    Victimization leads to more victimization. Suffering leads to more suffering. It’s turtles all the way down.

    Like

    • neighsayer January 5, 2016 / 6:17 pm

      I got one like that, “Shit Flows Downhill.” Ha. (I’m guessing the title is the story for you. Well, I say that “IF blacks are rougher on their kids, it’s because they believe in the roughness (punishment) same as white people, but in the ‘hood, their kids are more at risk, so they apply more of the same thing everybody, white people too, thinks will keep them on the straight and narrow.”) A few hand-picked ones for you though:

      https://abusewithanexcuse.com/2015/08/26/getting-carried-away-punishment-psychosis/

      https://abusewithanexcuse.com/2014/12/11/shows-of-strength-and-presenting-a-united-front/

      https://abusewithanexcuse.com/2014/12/06/trading-up-moral-equivalence-bigger-crimes-for-smaller-ones/

      Like

      • Benjamin David Steele January 5, 2016 / 6:29 pm

        For poor minorities and the poor in general, they often treat their children the way society has treated them, which can mean harsh punishment. But it is a practical mindset, to some extent. A poor minority parent thinks that they better get their kid used to a cruel world. If these kids don’t learn to take punishment and learn to tolerate injustice, they might end up dead from a police altercation.

        Poor minorities have to learn young that the world is unfair and that fighting against this could end badly. There is a perverse logic to punishing a kid to teach them that the world will punish them far worse, just for being poor and dark-skinned. In a social order of fear and oppression, parents feel a need to protect their children any way that seems necessary, even if it seems wrong or bad to an outside perspective.

        Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s